Headache and Pain Research

Original Articles

Availability, Accessibility, and Utilization of Diagnostics and Therapeutics for Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension in Asia: Soyoun Choi, Woo-Seok Ha, Soo-Jin Cho, Aynur Özge, Betül Baykan, Esme Ekizoglu, Kiratikorn Vongvaivanich, Koichi Hirata, Linh Tuyen Nguyen, Mamoru Shibata, Min Kyung Chu, Otgonbayar Luvsannorov, Ryotaro Ishii, Shengyuan Yu, Shih-Pin Chen, Shuu-Jiun Wang, Takao Takeshima, Tsubasa Takizawa, Vinh Khang Nguyen, Wei-Ta Chen, Yen-Feng Wang, Soo-Kyoung Kim, Mi Ji Lee; Received March 17, 2025 Accepted April 8, 2025 Published online June 16, 2025; DOI: https://doi.org/10.62087/hpr.2025.0005 [Epub ahead of print]

122 View
2 Download

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material: Purpose: Recent advances in imaging techniques have significantly enhanced the diagnosis of spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH). However, these developments have been reported mostly in Europe and the United States. This study aimed to evaluate the availability and utilization of diagnostic and treatment modalities for SIH in Asia, through a survey of regional headache specialists.
Methods
A literature search was conducted using PubMed, and members of the Asian Regional Consortium for Headache were contacted. Participants completed a two-step survey evaluating the availability, accessibility, and frequency of SIH diagnostic and treatment methods in their countries and institutions. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data.
Results
Twenty physicians from eight countries completed both rounds of the survey. Lumbar puncture, brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and spinal MRI are widely available across Asia, but real-time imaging techniques—such as dynamic computed tomography myelography and digital subtraction myelography—that precisely localize cerebrospinal fluid leaks are less accessible. Blind or semi-targeted epidural blood patches (EBPs) are available at most centers, but are easily accessible in only about half of cases. Surgical interventions are rarely available.
Conclusion
Most diagnostic methods for SIH are available in Asia, despite some regional disparities. The utilization of EBP and surgical interventions remains somewhat limited. This highlights the need for greater awareness and standardization of diagnostic methods in Asia.

Premonitory Symptoms in Migraine: Implications for Disease Burden and Cognitive Impairment, with Some Promising Answers: Utku Topbaş, Bahar Taşdelen, Nevra Öksüz Gürlen, Aynur Özge; Received November 29, 2024 Accepted January 10, 2025 Published online May 26, 2025; DOI: https://doi.org/10.62087/hpr.2024.0031 [Epub ahead of print]

223 View
10 Download

Abstract PDF: Purpose: This study evaluated the prevalence and impact of premonitory symptoms (PS) in people with migraine, assessing their influence on disability, cognitive function, and quality of life.
Methods
In a cross-sectional analysis at Mersin University Hospital, 186 migraine patients were interviewed to identify the presence of PS, using a structured questionnaire that included measures of disability (Migraine Disability Assessment Scale or MIDAS), quality of life (European Health Impact Scale or EUROHIS-8), and cognition (Migraine Attack Related Subjective Cognitive Scale or Mig-SCOG). Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, the t-test, and the Mann-Whitney U-test, with a significance threshold set at p<0.05.
Results
Among participants, 74.7% reported one or more PS, with the most common being neck stiffness (64.7%), photophobia (56.8%), fatigue (52.8%), and phonophobia (50.3%). Patients with PS demonstrated significantly lower quality of life scores (EUROHIS-8, p<0.001) and higher cognitive impairment scores (Mig-SCOG, p<0.001) than those without PS, despite similar levels of migraine disability (MIDAS, p=0.050).
Conclusion
The high prevalence of PS in people with migraine and their association with greater cognitive impairment and reduced quality of life indicate that more targeted interventions are necessary in this subgroup. PS may be either a driver of cognitive and quality of life burden or just a marker of it, and disambiguating these possibilities will be a critical area for future research and clinical focus. More optimized and standardized prospective studies are needed to clarify the prevalence of PS.

Review Article

Does Atogepant Offer a Safe and Efficacious Option for Episodic Migraine Prophylaxis? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis: Ahmed Mostafa Amin, Abdallah Abbas, Samar Ahmed Amer, Hoda Awad, Mahmoud Tarek Hefnawy, Anas Mansour, Mohamed El-Moslemani, Haneen Sabet, Aynur Ozge; Headache Pain Res. 2025;26(1):21-37. Published online February 17, 2025; DOI: https://doi.org/10.62087/hpr.2024.0030

976 View
34 Download

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material: Migraine, a chronic neurological disorder, imposes a significant burden on individuals and healthcare systems globally. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of atogepant in preventing episodic migraine (EM) in adults. A systematic search was conducted in four major databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL) up to June 2024. The inclusion criteria targeted randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing atogepant to placebo or standard care in patients with EM. Statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager (RevMan) software. Four RCTs with 2,018 patients receiving atogepant and 761 patients receiving placebo or standard care were included. Atogepant significantly reduced monthly migraine days compared to placebo at 10 mg daily (mean difference [MD], –1.16 days; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], –1.60 to –0.73), 30 mg daily (MD, –1.15 days; 95% CI, –1.64 to –0.66), 60 mg daily (MD, –1.48 days; 95% CI: –2.36 to –0.61 days), 30 mg twice daily (MD, –1.30 days; 95% CI, –2.17 to –0.43), and 60 mg twice daily (MD, –1.20 days; 95% CI, –1.90 to –0.50). A ≥50% reduction in migraine days was frequently significantly achieved with atogepant across all dosages. Atogepant was generally well tolerated, though it was associated with higher incidence rates of constipation and nausea compared to placebo. Atogepant is an effective and well-tolerated option for preventing EM, offering patients a noninvasive oral alternative to injectable therapies. Further research is warranted to explore its long-term safety and efficacy in diverse patient populations and refine its role in this field.

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search