Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Headache and Pain Research : Headache and Pain Research

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search
Advanced Search
mobile menu button

Articles

Page Path
HOME > Headache Pain Res > Volume 26(2); 2025 > Article
Original Article
 Clinical Characteristics of Migraine and Serum Beta-Endorphin Levels in Undergraduate Students in Osun State, Nigeria
Adebimpe Ogunmodede1orcid, Ahmed Idowu2orcid, Ahmad Sanusi3orcid, Uchenna Eke4, Akintunde Adebowale5orcid, Michael Fawale6orcid, Morenikeji Komolafe6orcid
Headache and Pain Research 2025;26(2):162-170.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62087/hpr.2025.0006
Published online: June 26, 2025

1Department of Medicine, Federal Medical Centre, Owo, Nigeria

2Stroke Department Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, United Kingdom

3Department of Medicine, Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex, Ile-Ife, Nigeria

4Neurology Unit, Department of Medicine, Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex, Ile-Ife, Nigeria

5Department of Neurology, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA

6Department of Medicine, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria

Correspondence: Adebimpe Ogunmodede, MD Department of Medicine, Federal Medical Centre, Oba Road, Owo 341101, Ondo, Nigeria Tel: +234-8035094545, E-mail: bimpefunmilola@yahoo.com
• Received: March 20, 2025   • Revised: June 12, 2025   • Accepted: June 12, 2025

© 2025 The Korean Headache Society

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • 5,686 Views
  • 37 Download
  • 1 Crossref
prev
Full Article

Download PDF Download PDF

  • Purpose
    Migraine is a common neurological disorder diagnosed using the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD). Beta-endorphin has pain-reducing properties and may serve as a future prognostic marker for migraine. This study aimed to assess the clinical characteristics of migraine and compare serum beta-endorphin levels in migraine patients and healthy controls among young undergraduate students.
  • Methods
    This comparative cross-sectional study was conducted among undergraduate students at Obafemi Awolowo University, Nigeria. Fifty participants with migraine headaches were recruited using purposive sampling according to the ICHD-3 criteria. Healthy controls were recruited using convenience sampling and matched for age and sex. A study questionnaire was administered to all participants. Serum beta-endorphin concentrations in both migraineurs and healthy controls were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. The beta-endorphin levels between migraine patients and healthy controls were compared using the Mann-Whitney U-test. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 26.0. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
  • Results
    A total of 12 males and 38 females were recruited in both groups. The most commonly used medication for acute migraine treatment was paracetamol, while amitriptyline was the most frequently used prophylactic. Median serum beta-endorphin levels were significantly lower in the migraine group, at 385.4 pg/mL (328.5–423.4 pg/mL), compared to the control group, at 442.9 pg/mL (357.5–477.6 pg/mL) (p=0.01).
  • Conclusion
    Serum beta-endorphin levels were significantly lower in young adults with migraine, suggesting a potential role for reduced endogenous analgesia in migraine pathophysiology. This supports the potential utility of beta-endorphin as a prognostic biomarker for migraine.
  • Keywords: Amitriptyline, Beta-endorphin, Migraine disorders
Migraine is a primary headache disorder characterized by lateralized, intense, throbbing, or pulsatile head pain.1 Common triggers for migraine attacks include emotional stress, alcohol, specific foods, insufficient or excessive sleep, strong odors, missing meals, and menstruation. The estimated 1-year prevalence is approximately 15% in the general population, and migraine is three times more common in women than in men.2,3 In Africa, an estimated 56 million people suffer from migraine.4 In Nigeria, Aderinto et al.5 reported a prevalence of 16%, while Mustapha et al.6 found a prevalence of 26.8% in Osun State. Studies among tertiary school students revealed lower prevalence rates: 2.4% in Ilorin,7 5.9% in Calabar,8 and 8.9% in Enugu.9 Migraine is believed to result from a combination of vascular and neurological events in the cranial meninges. The hypothalamus, trigeminovascular system, and brainstem are key structures implicated in migraine pathogenesis. Beta-endorphin is produced, along with other peptides, during the processing of proopiomelanocortin into adrenocorticotropic hormone, and exerts an analgesic effect.10 Misra et al.11 reported reduced serum beta-endorphin levels in patients with chronic migraine, with increased levels associated with symptom relief. Numerous studies have explored the prevalence, frequency, clinical profile, and triggers of migraine, and some have examined disability in undergraduate students with migraine in Nigeria.7,12,13 However, none of those studies have compared neurotransmitter levels between migraineurs and non-migraineurs. Such comparison may provide a prognostic index and inform future management strategies for migraine patients. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the clinical characteristics of migraine headaches among the study population and to compare serum beta-endorphin levels in migraine patients and controls.
1. Ethics approval and study design
This was a comparative cross-sectional study conducted among undergraduates of Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Osun State, following approval from the Health Research Ethics Committee of the Institute of Public Health and the Vice-Chancellor of the University. Ile-Ife is located at the intersection of roads from Ibadan, Ilesha, and Ondo. Obafemi Awolowo University, founded in 1961,14 has a health center offering both preventive and curative services to the University community. The study was conducted between November 2022 and October 2023. A sample size of 50 was used for both the migraine and control groups. This was calculated using the formula for comparing the means of two independent groups,15 using the values obtained from the study of Misra et al.11 Participants with migraine headaches were recruited using purposive sampling. Information about the study was disseminated through various channels (Class and Hall WhatsApp platforms, and departmental notice boards) to invite students with recurrent headaches to the clinic. Inclusion criteria were students aged 18 years or older. Exclusion criteria included a history of chronic mental illness such as schizophrenia, physical illnesses such as epilepsy, pain disorders, stroke, other headache disorders, and current use of opioid-containing medications. These exclusions were based on participant history. Participants who met the International Classification of Headache Disorders, third edition criteria for migraine were recruited from those presenting with headaches at the clinic. Study questionnaires were administered to eligible participants, followed by venous blood sample collection.
Age- and sex-matched controls were recruited using convenience sampling from the halls of residence, based on the same inclusion and exclusion criteria.
The first section of the questionnaire collected socio-demographic information, while the second section assessed the clinical characteristics of migraine headaches. Questionnaires were administered by the study authors. Participants were further subclassified into chronic migraine (≥15 day/mo), high-frequency migraine (9–14 day/mo), medium-frequency migraine (5–8 day/mo), and low-frequency migraine (1–4 day/mo).1
Participants underwent 20 minutes of physical rest in the supine position.16 Venipuncture was then performed to obtain 5 mL of venous blood under strict aseptic conditions, collected into plain bottles for beta-endorphin assay. Samples were centrifuged at 4,000 rpm for 20 minutes, and serum was separated. The serum was transferred to cryovials, labeled, and stored at –80 °C until analysis. Assays were conducted in the chemical pathology laboratory under the supervision of a consultant chemical pathologist. Human beta-endorphin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits from Wuhan Fine Biotech Co., Ltd. (Expiration date: 16-12-2023, Catalog number: EH0696), with a detection range of 15.62–1,000 pg/mL and using a competitive ELISA method, were employed for the assay. The microtiter plate was pre-coated with the target antigen. During the assay, the target in each sample competed with a fixed amount of target antigen on the solid-phase support for binding to biotinylated detection antibodies specific to beta-endorphin. Excess conjugate and unbound samples or standards were washed off the plate, after which horseradish peroxidase-streptavidin was added to each well and incubated. TMB substrate solution was then added. The enzyme-substrate reaction was terminated by adding sulfuric acid, and the resulting color change was measured spectrophotometrically at 450 nm. The concentration of beta-endorphin in each sample was determined by comparing the optical density values to a standard curve.
2. Statistical analysis
Numeric variables, such as age and serum beta-endorphin concentration, were tested for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Normally distributed data were summarized using mean and standard deviation, while non-normally distributed data were summarized using the median and interquartile range. Categorical data, such as sex and migraine-associated symptoms, were summarized as frequencies and proportions. Serum beta-endorphin concentrations between migraineurs and healthy controls were compared using the Mann-Whitney U-test. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed, including calculation of the area under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity, to determine the beta-endorphin concentration threshold that best differentiated migraineurs from non-migraineurs in this study sample. Data were analyzed using the SPSS software, version 26.0 (IBM Corp.). A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
1. Socio-demographic and anthropometric characteristics of the study subjects
The socio-demographic characteristics of the study participants are summarized in Table 1. There were 12 males (24.0%) and 38 females (76.0%) in both the migraine headache group and the control group. The median age and interquartile range for the migraine headache group was 22.0 years (20.8–25.0 years), and for the healthy control group, 22.0 years (21.0–24.0 years). The body mass index of respondents in the migraine group was 22.2 kg/m2 (19.4–26.0 kg/m2), compared to 21.3 kg/m2 (19.3–24.5 kg/m2) in the control group. This difference was not statistically significant (p=0.38).
2. Pattern of migraine headaches and medication use among the study participants
The characteristics of migraine headaches and medication use among study participants are shown in Table 2. The median duration of headache per episode was 21.0 hours (6.3–48.0 hours), with a median duration of 30.0 months (12.0–48.0 months) since diagnosis. The monthly cost of treatment was 500.0 naira (200.0–2,000.0 naira). Nausea was present in 20 participants (40.0%), vomiting in 11 (22.0%), and photophobia/phonophobia in 48 (96.0%). The most common medication used for acute migraine treatment was paracetamol, followed by other medications and ergot preparations. Eight migraine participants (16.0%) were on prophylactic therapy, with amitriptyline being the most frequently used prophylactic. Regarding headache frequency, 34% of respondents reported chronic migraine, while 38% experienced low-frequency headaches.
3. Triggers of migraine headaches
The triggers of migraine headaches are depicted in Figure 1. Stress and poor sleep accounted for 35.7% and 25.4% of reported triggers, respectively. Other triggers included hunger (14.3%), menstruation (9.5%), ovulation (4.8%), odors (4.8%), excessive sleep (2.4%), missed meals (2.4%), and specific foods such as smoked meat and fish (0.8%).
4. Serum beta-endorphin levels in migraineurs and controls
As shown in Table 3, and Figure 2, the median serum beta-endorphin level in migraineurs was 385.4 pg/mL (328.5–423.4 pg/mL), compared to 442.9 pg/mL (357.5–477.6 pg/mL) in the control group. This difference was statistically significant (p=0.01).
5. Receiver operating characteristic curve for beta-endorphin and migraine headaches
Table 4 and Figure 3 demonstrate that a beta-endorphin level 403.4 pg/mL predicts the absence of migraine headaches, with a sensitivity and specificity of 64.0% and 71.4%, respectively. The positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were 66.7% and 69.6%, respectively.
6. Relationship between the frequency of migraine headaches and serum beta-endorphin
Table 5 summarizes the relationship between the frequency of migraine headaches, and serum beta-endorphin. No statistically significant relationship was found between headache frequency and any of these factors.
This study is the first to assay serum beta-endorphin levels among migraineurs in Africa. Median serum beta-endorphin was significantly lower in young adults with migraine compared to controls, consistent with findings from previous studies,17,18 suggesting a potential role for reduced endogenous analgesia in migraine pathophysiology. This finding supports the consideration of beta-endorphin as a possible prognostic biomarker for migraine.
A statistically significant relationship was observed between serum beta-endorphin levels and the presence of migraine. A cut-off value of less than 403.4 pg/mL yielded a sensitivity of 64.0%, specificity of 71.4%, PPV of 66.7%, and NPV of 69.6% for diagnosing migraine. However, this level of sensitivity and specificity is relatively low to qualify serum beta-endorphin as a standalone biomarker for migraine, especially when compared to serum serotonin, which has been reported to be lower in migraine patients, with both sensitivity and specificity of 80%.19 No correlation was found between headache frequency and serum beta-endorphin levels in this study, a finding that aligns with the results of Misra et al.,20 who also observed no initial correlation but subsequently reported a positive association—a 50% reduction in headache frequency with increased serum beta-endorphin—after one month of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, a non-pharmacologic approach to migraine management, has been shown to increase serum beta-endorphin and reduce headache frequency. Regular aerobic exercise also increases circulating beta-endorphin and is recommended for migraine patients due to its beneficial effect on headache frequency.21 In contrast, a study on knee osteoarthritis—another inflammatory pain condition—found that non-invasive brain stimulation improved inflammatory markers but decreased beta-endorphin levels.22 This paradoxical reduction in beta-endorphin, despite pain relief from non-invasive brain stimulation, may be due to persistently decreased beta-endorphin secretion in chronic pain conditions.23
This study also provides insight into the clinical features and treatment patterns of young migraineurs in Africa. The higher prevalence of migraine in females has been attributed to estrogen sensitivity, genetic factors, and differences in stress and pain perception.24 Paracetamol was the most commonly used analgesic for acute migraine treatment, consistent with previous reports.25,26 This is likely due to its widespread availability, affordability, and popularity among university students.27 However, paracetamol is not very effective for acute migraine attacks. The low rate of sumatriptan use may be attributed to its high cost and limited accessibility, a trend seen in other African settings.28
Most respondents identified two or more migraine triggers, with stress being the most frequently reported, as in other studies.26 Stress, defined as emotional strain in response to challenging life events,29 is prevalent among university students in Nigeria, who often experience both physical stress (such as walking long distances to class) and mental stress (focusing during lectures, studying for exams). Academic-related stress is reportedly higher in developing countries.30 Poor sleep was a trigger for migraine in 25.4% of participants, consistent with findings from other research.31,32 Migraineurs are known to have poorer sleep quality, shorter sleep duration, and more daytime sleepiness than non-migraineurs.32,33 Variations exist in the clinical characteristics of migraine across different populations. While photophobia and phonophobia were frequent in this study, the prevalence of nausea was lower than in an Egyptian study by Oraby et al.34 The proportion of respondents with chronic migraine was higher (34.7%) than in the population-based CaMEO study in the United States (8.8%).35 A hospital-based study in North West Nigeria by Ali et al.13 reported a chronic migraine rate of 69.2%, much higher than the 24.7% found in a similar study in Taiwan.36 These differences may reflect disparities in healthcare delivery between continents. Chronic migraine may result from delays in diagnosis and effective treatment, potentially due to poor health-seeking behavior and limited knowledge of headache disorders among primary care physicians, who are often the first point of contact.13,37
The median serum beta-endorphin level was significantly lower in young adults with migraine than in controls, suggesting that reduced endogenous analgesia may play a role in migraine pathophysiology and supporting the possibility that beta-endorphin might serve as a prognostic biomarker for migraine. This study is the first to assay serum beta-endorphin among migraineurs in Africa. However, it was limited to undergraduate students, a predominantly healthy age group, limiting the generalizability of these findings to other age groups. Factors such as recent meals, sexual activity, ictal versus interictal status, headache severity, response to abortive medication, preventive therapy, or menstrual cycle phase—which could all influence beta-endorphin levels—were not controlled for. Migraine data were self-reported via questionnaire, introducing the possibility of recall bias and under- or over-reporting of symptoms.
Figure 1.
Triggers of migraine headache.
hpr-2025-0006f1.jpg
Figure 2.
Box plot showing beta-endorphin levels in migraine patients and controls.
hpr-2025-0006f2.jpg
Figure 3.
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of serum beta-endorphin levels in migraine headache patients versus controls.
hpr-2025-0006f3.jpg
Table 1.
Socio-demographic and anthropometric characteristics of the study subjects
Variable Category Study group Statistics
Migraine headache group (n=50) Healthy group (n=50)
Age (yr) 22.0 (20.8–25.0) 22.0 (21.0–24.0) U=1,220.0, p=0.83
Sex Male 12 (24.0) 12 (24.0) χ2=0.05, p=0.82
Female 38 (76.0) 38 (76.0)
Marital status Single 45 (90.0) 47 (94.0) Fisher’s=0.54, p=0.72
Married 5 (10.0) 3 (6.0)
Body mass index (kg/m2) 22.2 (19.4–26.0) 21.3 (19.3–24.5) U=1,124.0, p=0.38

Values are presented as median (interquartile range) or number (%).

U, Mann-Whitney U-test.

Table 2.
Pattern of migraine headaches and medication use among the study participants (n=50)
Variable Frequency
Average duration of headache per episode (hr) 21.0 (6.3–48.0)
Duration since diagnosis of migraine headache (mo) 30.0 (12.0–48.0)
Average cost of treatment of migraine headache (naira) 500.0 (200.0–2,000.0)
Nausea
 No 30 (60.0)
 Yes 20 (40.0)
Vomiting
 No 39 (78.0)
 Yes 11 (22.0)
Photophobia/phonophobia
 No 2 (4.0)
 Yes 48 (96.0)
Premonition signs
 No 23 (46.0)
 Yes 27 (54.0)
Types of premonition signs (n=27)
 Sensory 11 (40.7)
 Visual 8 (29.6)
 Both 5 (18.5)
 Others 3 (11.1)
Migraine prophylaxis
 No 42 (84.0)
 Yes 8 (16.0)
Medication for prophylaxis (n=9)
 Propranolol 1 (11.1)
 Amitriptyline 7 (77.8)
 Amitriptyline+propranolol 1 (11.1)
Medications for acute migraine
 Paracetamol 21 (42.0)
 Ergot preparation 8 (16.0)
 Aspirin 5 (10.0)
 Sumatriptan 5 (10.0)
 None 1 (2.0)
 Others 10 (20.0)
Frequency of migraine headache
 Chronic migraine 17 (34.0)
 High frequency migraine 4 (8.0)
 Medium frequency migraine 10 (20.0)
 Low frequency migraine 19 (38.0)

Values are presented as median (interquartile range) or number (%).

Table 3.
Comparison of mean serum beta-endorphin among migraine patients and healthy control
Variable Intervention group Statistics
Migraine headache group (n=50) Healthy group (n=50)
Serum beta-endorphin (pg/mL) 385.4 (328.5–423.4) 442.9 (357.5–477.6) U=843,000, p=0.01

Values are presented as median (interquartile range).

Table 4.
Receiver operator characteristics of beta-endorphin and migraine headache
AUC p-value 95% CI Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) PPV (%) NPV (%) Cut off value (pg/mL)
Beta-endorphin 0.70 0.01 0.54–0.77 64.0 71.4 66.7 69.6 403.4

AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value.

Table 5.
Relationship between the frequency of migraine headaches and serum beta-endorphin
Variable Frequency of headache Statistics
Chronic migraine High-frequency migraine Medium frequency migraine Low frequency migraine
Serum beta-endorphin 371.4 (299.5–415.8) 380.2 (322.5–465.3) 385.5 (315.2–435.3) 387.4 (305.9–416.7) H=0.255, p=0.968

Values are presented as median (interquartile range).

  • 1. Lin YK, Lin GY, Lee JT, et al. Associations between sleep quality and migraine frequency: a cross-sectional case-control study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016;95:e3554.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 2. GBD 2016 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet 2017;390:1211-1259.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 3. Ashina M. Migraine. N Engl J Med 2020;383:1866-1876.ArticlePubMed
  • 4. Woldeamanuel YW, Andreou AP, Cowan RP. Prevalence of migraine headache and its weight on neurological burden in Africa: a 43-year systematic review and meta-analysis of community-based studies. J Neurol Sci 2014;342:1-15.ArticlePubMed
  • 5. Aderinto N, Olatunji G, Kokori E, et al. Prevalence, characteristics, and treatment outcomes of migraine headache in Nigeria: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Headache Pain 2024;25:172.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 6. Mustapha AF, Fawale MB, Adebanjo OM, Arawomo A. A survey of headache among nursing students in a Nigerian university. Res J Health Sci 2023;7:39-47.
  • 7. Sanya EO, Desalu OO, Aderibigbe SA, Kolo PM, Mustapha AF, Adeyanju OA. Prevalence and clinical characteristics of headaches among undergraduate students in three tertiary institutions in Ilorin, Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract 2017;20:1411-1416.ArticlePubMed
  • 8. Oparah SK, Olose EO, Asibong UE, Ozomma SI. Migraine prevalence and impact among medical students of the university of Calabar, Southern Nigeria. World J Med Sci 2020;17:79-85.
  • 9. Ekenze O, Ezeala-Adikaibe B, Orjioke C, et al. Prevalence and pattern of migraine, tension type headache and chronic daily headache among medical and nursing students in Enugu, South East Nigeria. Health 2018;10:1283-1293.ArticlePDF
  • 10. Pilozzi A, Carro C, Huang X. Roles of β-endorphin in stress, behavior, neuroinflammation, and brain energy metabolism. Int J Mol Sci 2020;22:338.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 11. Misra UK, Kalita J, Tripathi GM, Bhoi SK. Is β endorphin related to migraine headache and its relief? Cephalalgia 2013;33:316-322.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 12. Ezeala-Adikaibe B, Onyekonwu C, Ijoma U, et al. Assessment of migraine disability using the migraine disability assessment questionnaire in young Nigerians. World J Neurosci 2018;8:411-422.ArticlePDF
  • 13. Ali MW, Musami UB, Sa’ad FK, et al. Profile of migraine patients in a developing country: a multicentre study. SN Compr Clin Med 2020;2:1153-1157.ArticlePDF
  • 14. Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex. A brief history of OAUTHC [Internet]. Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex; 2022 [cited 2022 Mar 28]. Available from: https://oauthc.gov.ng/about/about-oauthc
  • 15. Jekel JF, Katz DL, Elmore JG, Wild DMG. Epidemiology, biostatistics and preventive medicine. 3rd ed. Saunders; 2007.
  • 16. Bidari A, Ghavidel-Parsa B, Rajabi S, Sanaei O, Toutounchi M. The acute effect of maximal exercise on plasma beta-endorphin levels in fibromyalgia patients. Korean J Pain 2016;29:249-254.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 17. Mohammed N, Allam H, Elghoroury E, Zikri EN, Helmy GA, Elgendy A. Evaluation of serum beta-endorphin and substance P in knee osteoarthritis patients treated by laser acupuncture. J Complement Integr Med 2018;15:20170010.ArticlePubMed
  • 18. van Dongen RM, Zielman R, Noga M, et al. Migraine biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cephalalgia 2017;37:49-63.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 19. Ren C, Liu J, Zhou J, et al. Low levels of serum serotonin and amino acids identified in migraine patients. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2018;496:267-273.ArticlePubMed
  • 20. Misra UK, Kalita J, Tripathi G, Bhoi SK. Role of β endorphin in pain relief following high rate repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in migraine. Brain Stimul 2017;10:618-623.ArticlePubMed
  • 21. Song TJ, Chu MK. Exercise in treatment of migraine including chronic migraine. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2021;25:14.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 22. Suchting R, Colpo GD, Rocha NP, Ahn H. The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on inflammation in older adults with knee osteoarthritis: a Bayesian residual change analysis. Biol Res Nurs 2020;22:57-63.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 23. Choi HY, Lee CH. Can beta-endorphin be used as a biomarker for chronic low back pain? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Pain Med 2019;20:28-36.ArticlePubMed
  • 24. Oshinaike O, Ojo O, Okubadejo N, Ojelabi O, Dada A. Primary headache disorders at a tertiary health facility in Lagos, Nigeria: prevalence and consultation patterns. Biomed Res Int 2014;2014:782915.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 25. Birru EM, Abay Z, Abdelwuhab M, Basazn A, Sirak B, Teni FS. Management of headache and associated factors among undergraduate medicine and health science students of University of Gondar, North West Ethiopia. J Headache Pain 2016;17:56.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 26. Raju S, Geetha S. Prevalence of migraine among medical students of a tertiary care teaching medical college and hospital in South India: a cross-sectional study. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol 2018;8:1377-1383.Article
  • 27. Olugbake OA, Akinola AA, Ekiran OO. Knowledge and Use of over the counter analgesics among medical and nonmedical students of the University of Lagos. J Basic Soc Pharm Res 2019;1:37-45.Article
  • 28. Puledda F, de Boer I, Messina R, et al. Worldwide availability of medications for migraine and tension-type headache: a survey of the International Headache Society. Cephalalgia 2024;44:3331024241297688.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 29. Dodick DW, Silberstein SD. Migraine. 3rd ed. Oxford University Press; 2016. p. 124.
  • 30. Omogbiya AI, Anachuna KK, Umukoro EK, Moke EG, Nzei A. Academic-related stress and prevalence of migraine and tension-type headaches amongst undergraduates of Delta State University, Abraka, Nigeria. Res J Health Sci 2023;8:133-145.ArticlePDF
  • 31. Halay S, Saror S, Abdalla AA, et al. Prevalence of migraine and trigger factors among adult rural Sudanese population 2018. Curr J Appl Sci Technol 2019;36:1-8.ArticlePDF
  • 32. Rodríguez-Almagro D, Achalandabaso-Ochoa A, Obrero-Gaitán E, Osuna-Pérez MC, Ibáñez-Vera AJ, Lomas-Vega R. Sleep alterations in female college students with migraines. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020;17:5456.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 33. Morgan I, Eguia F, Gelaye B, et al. Sleep disturbances and quality of life in Sub-Saharan African migraineurs. J Headache Pain 2015;16:18.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 34. Oraby MI, Soliman RH, Mahmoud MA, Elfar E, ElMonem NAA. Migraine prevalence, clinical characteristics, and health care-seeking practice in a sample of medical students in Egypt. Egypt J Neurol Psychiatry Neurosurg 2021;57:26.ArticlePDF
  • 35. Lipton RB, Manack Adams A, Buse DC, Fanning KM, Reed ML. A comparison of the Chronic Migraine Epidemiology and Outcomes (CaMEO) study and American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention (AMPP) study: demographics and headache-related disability. Headache 2016;56:1280-1289.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 36. Yin JH, Lin YK, Yang CP, et al. Prevalence and association of lifestyle and medical-, psychiatric-, and pain-related comorbidities in patients with migraine: a cross-sectional study. Headache 2021;61:715-726.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 37. Alzahrani F, Hmoud M, Khayat H, et al. Knowledge of primary healthcare physicians about headache disorders: a cross-sectional study. Qual Prim Care 2016;24:83-86.

Figure & Data

References

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  
    • Efficacy of aerobic training on resting-state brain wave, pain, sleep quality, and quality of life among university students with migraine symptoms: A randomized controlled trial
      Kiruthika Selvakumar, Lee Fan Tan, Chai Nien Foo, Kit Mun Hou
      Cephalalgia Reports.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef

    • PubReader PubReader
    • ePub LinkePub Link
    • Cite this Article
      Cite this Article
      export Copy Download
      Close
      Download Citation
      Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.
      Format:
      • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
      • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
      Include:
      • Citation for the content below
      Clinical Characteristics of Migraine and Serum Beta-Endorphin Levels in Undergraduate Students in Osun State, Nigeria
      Headache Pain Res. 2025;26(2):162-170.   Published online June 30, 2025
      DOI: https://doi.org/10.62087/hpr.2025.0006
      Close
    • XML DownloadXML Download
    Figure
    • 0
    • 1
    • 2
    Clinical Characteristics of Migraine and Serum Beta-Endorphin Levels in Undergraduate Students in Osun State, Nigeria
    Image Image Image
    Figure 1. Triggers of migraine headache.
    Figure 2. Box plot showing beta-endorphin levels in migraine patients and controls.
    Figure 3. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of serum beta-endorphin levels in migraine headache patients versus controls.

    Figure 1.

    Figure 2.

    Figure 3.

    Clinical Characteristics of Migraine and Serum Beta-Endorphin Levels in Undergraduate Students in Osun State, Nigeria
    Variable Category Study group Statistics
    Migraine headache group (n=50) Healthy group (n=50)
    Age (yr) 22.0 (20.8–25.0) 22.0 (21.0–24.0) U=1,220.0, p=0.83
    Sex Male 12 (24.0) 12 (24.0) χ2=0.05, p=0.82
    Female 38 (76.0) 38 (76.0)
    Marital status Single 45 (90.0) 47 (94.0) Fisher’s=0.54, p=0.72
    Married 5 (10.0) 3 (6.0)
    Body mass index (kg/m2) 22.2 (19.4–26.0) 21.3 (19.3–24.5) U=1,124.0, p=0.38
    Variable Frequency
    Average duration of headache per episode (hr) 21.0 (6.3–48.0)
    Duration since diagnosis of migraine headache (mo) 30.0 (12.0–48.0)
    Average cost of treatment of migraine headache (naira) 500.0 (200.0–2,000.0)
    Nausea
     No 30 (60.0)
     Yes 20 (40.0)
    Vomiting
     No 39 (78.0)
     Yes 11 (22.0)
    Photophobia/phonophobia
     No 2 (4.0)
     Yes 48 (96.0)
    Premonition signs
     No 23 (46.0)
     Yes 27 (54.0)
    Types of premonition signs (n=27)
     Sensory 11 (40.7)
     Visual 8 (29.6)
     Both 5 (18.5)
     Others 3 (11.1)
    Migraine prophylaxis
     No 42 (84.0)
     Yes 8 (16.0)
    Medication for prophylaxis (n=9)
     Propranolol 1 (11.1)
     Amitriptyline 7 (77.8)
     Amitriptyline+propranolol 1 (11.1)
    Medications for acute migraine
     Paracetamol 21 (42.0)
     Ergot preparation 8 (16.0)
     Aspirin 5 (10.0)
     Sumatriptan 5 (10.0)
     None 1 (2.0)
     Others 10 (20.0)
    Frequency of migraine headache
     Chronic migraine 17 (34.0)
     High frequency migraine 4 (8.0)
     Medium frequency migraine 10 (20.0)
     Low frequency migraine 19 (38.0)
    Variable Intervention group Statistics
    Migraine headache group (n=50) Healthy group (n=50)
    Serum beta-endorphin (pg/mL) 385.4 (328.5–423.4) 442.9 (357.5–477.6) U=843,000, p=0.01
    AUC p-value 95% CI Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) PPV (%) NPV (%) Cut off value (pg/mL)
    Beta-endorphin 0.70 0.01 0.54–0.77 64.0 71.4 66.7 69.6 403.4
    Variable Frequency of headache Statistics
    Chronic migraine High-frequency migraine Medium frequency migraine Low frequency migraine
    Serum beta-endorphin 371.4 (299.5–415.8) 380.2 (322.5–465.3) 385.5 (315.2–435.3) 387.4 (305.9–416.7) H=0.255, p=0.968
    Table 1. Socio-demographic and anthropometric characteristics of the study subjects

    Values are presented as median (interquartile range) or number (%).

    U, Mann-Whitney U-test.

    Table 2. Pattern of migraine headaches and medication use among the study participants (n=50)

    Values are presented as median (interquartile range) or number (%).

    Table 3. Comparison of mean serum beta-endorphin among migraine patients and healthy control

    Values are presented as median (interquartile range).

    Table 4. Receiver operator characteristics of beta-endorphin and migraine headache

    AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value.

    Table 5. Relationship between the frequency of migraine headaches and serum beta-endorphin

    Values are presented as median (interquartile range).

    Table 1.

    Table 2.

    Table 3.

    Table 4.

    Table 5.

    Headache and Pain Research : Headache and Pain Research
    © The Korean Headache Society.
    TOP